Opinion

On Dependence and Autonomy: Chronicles of Egypt’s Ailing Daddy State.

On Dependence and Autonomy: Chronicles of Egypt’s Ailing Daddy State.

Despite a revolution, the 'Daddy State' remains.
Despite a revolution, the ‘Daddy State’ remains.

By Hassan Fayed, contributor, EgyptianStreets.com
“The Arab Republic of Egypt is a socialist democratic state.” That is what Article 1 of the 1971 Egyptian constitution states. This Article summarizes the chaos that Egypt has long been enduring since the 1952 revolution.

Socialism, in Marxist theory, is a stage that eventually leads to communism. It stands precisely against the principles of democracy. The problem with Egypt is that it is a country with no clear definition. For decades, Egypt has been swinging between socialism and capitalism, trying to find a balance between the two, leading to its self-destruction.

Today, this confusion has left the country between two extremes. When Nasser first introduced his glorious socialist policies, Egyptians were granted many privileges that they had previously lacked. What they had failed to notice was that they were given a bag of bad fish in exchange for their fishing rod.

The ‘Daddy’ State currently employs over 5.5 million people, with an average of five working hours per day per employee. These employees, who really make everybody’s life miserable whenever we need to get a document, just got a raise for the average of five hours of work they do (and they’re still complaining!)

The government, meanwhile, also holds over EGP 600 billion in assets and investments, with an impressive portfolio including almost everything from railways to factories. How much do they make out of these assets? Nothing. Most of these companies are operating at a loss. Even worse, many of those employed by these companies rarely show up to work, and yet they complain about their wages. Ever heard of someone going on a strike for not working? Yeah, that is how messed up we have become

Education in Egypt is free. But it has become so useless that the average Egyptian spends over 25 percent of their income on private tutoring for their children. It is needless to point out that the country isn’t exactly crawling with Einsteins anymore.

Education in Egypt is largely free…but that does not mean it is any good.

Health care is also free, and I won’t enumerate the discrepancies in the system as to prevent you from further depression. Meanwhile, fuel and electricity subsidies continue to cost the country billions every year, and today we suffer from blackouts and fuel shortages.

Any economist would tell you that all these measures create inefficiencies. It is simple: if fuel barely costs you any money, you will use more fuel. As you use more fuel, the government pays more on subsidies. As the government pays more on subsidies, it becomes unable to meet the market demand; and so you have shortages.

If you get paid without working, you will not work. People were receiving without giving. The very concept of having a career ceased to exist, as motivation became useless and even sometimes penalized.

Protesters today demand ‘social justice’. At first, it sounds like a lovely term. But the problem is that it is too broad of a term that it could encompass any demand. Some countries define social justice as having free health care. Others define it as having free education. We need to set our priorities straight and know what we want. We have reached a point where getting married is now considered to be a social justice that ‘Daddy’ needs to secure. No government could possibly deliver on such demands. Do not be mistaken: it is not the people’s fault that they have those beliefs; the responsibility lies on the consecutive cowardly governments who continued to endorse this rhetoric.

Gamal Abdel Nasser..the first leader of the Daddy State?
Gamal Abdel Nasser..the first leader of the Daddy State?

While ‘Daddy’ was too focused on fulfilling his paternal duties, he forgot his initial job – which is to regulate and administrate. Capitalism thrived over the past decade because there were no regulations whatsoever. The gap between the rich and the poor grew so large because there was no system. It really startles me how a state that employs over five million people did not have the regulatory tools to prevent slums from exploding across Egypt.

The whole world has long realised that socialism is unsustainable. Unregulated capitalism is also catastrophic. Egypt is still trapped in the 80s when most socialist countries were beginning their transition towards a capitalist market. Margaret Thatcher was not called the Iron Lady for no reason. She knew that she needed to abolish the concept of the ‘Daddy State’, and she had the guts to do it. Today, Britain thrives on the policies and the sacrifices that she made and outlined. Her governance proved that it does not take a man in uniform to be brave.

What I fear the most is that Egyptians are continuing to fall in the same trap. We do not need a new Daddy that will maintain a socialist fetish with a capitalist visage. We need a leader who has the guts to break it down and give us the hard truth.

If this country has any chance of surviving, it has to define its nature and set its goals. The State continues to operate as a babysitter. Whoever rules the country next needs to replace equality of outcome with equality of opportunity.  It should not be the government’s responsibility to place people on the ladder, but to provide them with the same tools to climb. In other words, we need to start realizing that only hard work pays off.

You can follow Hassan Fayed on Twitter by clicking here, and Facebook by clicking here.

Why Sisi Should Be Egypt's Next President
On Hope and Depression: Diaries of a Teenage Revolution

Subscribe to our newsletter


  • sally wilton

    What an excellent article. The writer hits the nail on the head totally. My husband is a businessman trying to forge his way in Egypt and the problems the writer cites are so precise. The way in which the bureaucracy will do anything possible for the ordinary many to prevent him starting or succeeding in any enterprise, how the government and the army hold vast tracts of land and industry and fail to achieve anything productive with them. Anyone who disagrees with this article cannot have lived or worked in Egypt. Well done.

  • Oxyman1

    Structural and grammatical flaws aside, this article seems to come from a place of deep-seated ignorance.

    There are a number of audacious claims in this article made without a semblance of evidence or critical thought to back them up.
    ‘[Socialism] stands precisely against the principles of democracy.’
    ‘The gap between the rich and the poor grew so large because there was no system.’
    ‘Socialism, in Marxist theory, is a stage that eventually leads to communism.’ – This is true, however the term ‘socialism’ has become a much broader term, and using its strict high-marxist definition clouds the arguments against socialism in the rest of the article.

    Praising Mrs. Thatcher for reducing spending is particularly laughable when it is fairly common knowledge that, despite her attack on public services, Thatcher’s spending increased throughout her reign: http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/04/how-public-spending-rose-under-thatcher

    Then there is the fact that the writer seems to be confused by his own argument. He sings the praises of an unregulated market, ‘Capitalism thrived over the past decade because there were no regulations whatsoever’ and then derides it in the next paragraph whilst providing no evidence for either claim.

    ‘I won’t enumerate the discrepancies in the system as to prevent you from further depression’ – you won’t? The purpose of any political writer should be to elaborate on the critical thinking that brought them to the argument they are making.

    The writer suggests focus on ‘equality of opportunity’ and yet devotes a paragraph to a churlish and ignorant attack on state funded education. Surely, one of the best ways to assure equality of opportunity is a well-funded, consistent public schooling system?

    Apologies for the overlong response but I am currently running on a combination of caffeine, oxycontin and searing rage.

  • Alvin Ireland

    So keen to have a crack at the ‘daddy’ state. Bit rich coming from someone who gets £500 a week pocket money from Daddy.

  • mohamed

    I am so proud of you

Opinion

More in Opinion

Credit: Martin Roemers/Anastasia Photo

How One Word Reflects a Class Split in Egypt’s Social Dynamics

Ahmed El WakeelNovember 7, 2016
cairoskye

Faring Poorly and Ways Forward: Reforming Egypt’s Policies

Ahmed TohamyOctober 11, 2016
Photo via Mohanad Ehab's Facebook page

93% Leukemia, 100% Freedom: Former Egyptian Prisoner Mohanad Ehab Loses Battle With Cancer

Egyptian StreetsOctober 4, 2016
1280x720-x8y

Should Prostitution Be Legalized in Egypt?

Ahmed El WakeelAugust 29, 2016
b41010a0-4f05-11e4-a6b5-d71674fe9375_burkinis

The Burkini: A Veil of Confusion

Ayman S. AshourAugust 26, 2016
14113807_10154429711463544_218330925_o

President Expiration Dates in Egypt

Mohamed TharwatAugust 24, 2016
Tunisian women, one (R) wearing a "burkini", a full-body swimsuit designed for Muslim women, swim on August 16, 2016 at Ghar El Melh beach near Bizerte, north-east of the capital Tunis.  / AFP PHOTO / FETHI BELAID

Why Banning the ‘Burkini’ is Shameful for Europe

Laurie TreffersAugust 23, 2016
9

The Arab Identity in a Broken Hourglass

Mirna Khaled AbdulaalAugust 11, 2016
Egyptian Streets is an independent, young, and grass roots news media organization aimed at providing readers with an alternate depiction of events that occur on Egyptian and Middle Eastern streets, and to establish an engaging social platform for readers to discover and discuss the various issues that impact the region.

© 2016 ES Media UG. All Rights Reserved.