//Skip to content
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Egyptian Students’ Theatre Performance on the Holocaust Sparks Controversy

August 25, 2019


A theatre performance on the Holocaust performed by Egyptian students from Ain Shams University titled “Sobibor” sparked much controversy in Egypt, as fights and clashes erupted during the performance.

The latter took place in the National Theater Festival headed by the artist Ahmed Abdel Aziz.

Written and directed by Mohammed Zaki, the theatre performance discusses the Holocaust and the Sobibor extermination camp in which the Jews were burned and tormented by the Nazi Germans.

During the performance on Wednesday evening, there were verbal altercations between the audience and members of the theater group, and a clash of hands because of what members of the audience considered to be as bias in favor of Israel, ignoring what the Israelis are now practicing against Palestinians.

Critics of the show accused members of the team of “defending Zionism” and trying to “sabotage the minds of young people,” as art critic Omneya Talaat wrote that “Sobibor” falsifies history and begs for sympathy for the Jews.

“Why go so far as to arouse sympathy for the Jews in 2019 while we are witnessing the massacres done by the Zionists in the Arab region now, including Egypt and not Palestine alone?” she wrote on her Facebook page.

On the other hand, art critic Mohamed El-Rouby, editor-in-chief of the “Masrahna”, wrote on his Facebook page that, “the visions of creativity do not necessarily have to be agreed upon, but only must possess clarity. And then afterwards comes the discussion about it (with or against it), without any party claiming to know the whole truth.”

“The director wanted to focus on the link between the crimes of the Nazis and the crimes of Zionism, and to emphasize his position rejecting Zionism,” he added.

Writer and art critic Hatem Hafez also said, “for those who misunderstood the play, I tell them that stories are told as metaphors. A Danish prince mentioned in Shakespeare’s text is not in actuality in Denmark, but he is a purely theatrical figure. A pure metaphor as Helmer and Albert are in the text of Muhammad Zaki, and those who do not realize the idea of metaphors should discuss anything but art.”

In response to the criticisms, Mohammed Zaki told reporters that “the show sheds light on the Holocaust to ask an important question: which is, how can the Jews, who always declare that their parents and grandparents tasted severe suffering by Hitler’s regime in the Nazi extermination camps, see and accept the same suffering experienced by the Palestinians?”

Most Egyptians and Arabs are sympathetic to the Palestinian cause due to the experiences witnessed in the region following the creation of Israel as a state, from the 1948 war to the 1967 war, the Lebanese war, the Intifada and the Yom Kippur War.

The most infamous event from the crisis is the Nakba disaster during the 1948 war, which referred to the more than 700,000 Palestinians who were expelled from their homes.

The roots of the modern Arab–Israeli conflict lie in the rise of Zionism and the reactionary Palestinian and Arab nationalism that arose in response to Zionism and Jewish immigration following the Second World Wa. Territory regarded by the Jewish people as their historical homeland is also regarded by the Palestinian movement as historically and presently belonging to the Palestinian Arabs.


Comments (5)

  1. […] the play was too sympathetic to Jews and, somehow, biased toward Israel. Prominent art critics accused the performers of "defending Zionism," falsifying history, and begging for sympathy for the Jewish […]